The best Apollo alternatives are Otto, which drives Apollo and other providers directly rather than billing its own credits, Clay, for a per-action table instead of a negotiated contract, and n8n, for wiring the calls yourself. All three are compared below against what Apollo's own site and third-party contract data actually show.
How we judged these Apollo alternatives
We checked what each option actually meters, who it's built for, and where it falls short, Otto included. Apollo's own site states 500,000+ companies use it, which is why its real pricing, not its sticker price, is the benchmark here.
The 3 best Apollo alternatives
Otto
At a glance:
Price: Not published.
Best for: A team that wants Apollo itself, plus Claude, Apify, Prospeo, Hunter, Reoon, Instantly and Ordinal, driven by one agent instead of run by hand across eight tabs.
Cons: No recorded figure yet compares a run's actual spend to Apollo's contract cost, and Otto's own price isn't published either.
Clay
At a glance:
Price: Free tier: 500 actions and 100 data credits a month. Launch: starting at $167/month for 15,000 actions and 3,000 data credits. Growth: starting at $446/month for 40,000 actions and 6,000 data credits. (Clay's own pricing page.)
Best for: A GTM engineer who wants a visual table and is fine paying per action and per data credit; GTME Pulse's 2026 analysis found Clay named in 69% of GTM Engineer job postings.
Cons: Every enrichment call draws down a metered action or data-credit balance, even on the $446/month Growth plan's 40,000-action cap.
n8n
At a glance:
Price: Free to self-host, per n8n's own site.
Best for: A team that wants to call enrichment APIs directly from a workflow it owns.
Cons: n8n connects to APIs but doesn't provide the underlying contact or company data itself, so the enrichment source and its cost are separate from n8n.
What Apollo's own numbers say about the real price
Apollo's own site doesn't publish a self-serve rate. Vendr's data on 101 recorded purchases of Apollo.io puts the median annual contract at $19,000, ranging $4,284 to $45,000, with buyers in that dataset saving 30% on average by negotiating. Enlyft's customer profile of Apollo.io finds 51% of its customers are small companies (under 50 employees) and 42% medium-sized, so the credit drain this page is written for is mostly a small-team problem, not just an enterprise one.
See whether Otto replaces the Clay and Apollo stack for the direct comparison.
Ready to see the research before anything sends? start with your website.
Frequently asked questions
Does Apollo publish a flat price?
No. Apollo's own site doesn't list a self-serve rate; Vendr's data on 101 purchases shows a median annual contract of $19,000, ranging $4,284 to $45,000.
Who actually buys Apollo?
Enlyft's customer profile finds 51% of Apollo's customers are small companies under 50 employees, and 42% are medium-sized.
Is Clay cheaper than Apollo?
Clay's own pricing page lists tiers starting free and running to $446/month for 40,000 actions; Apollo's real contracts, per Vendr, run $4,284 to $45,000 a year. The two meter differently, actions and credits versus an annual contract, so the numbers aren't directly comparable on this evidence alone.
Does Otto replace Apollo outright?
Otto's own site names Apollo as one of the integrations it drives directly, alongside Claude, Apify, Prospeo, Hunter, Reoon, Instantly and Ordinal, so it works with Apollo rather than only replacing it.
Can n8n enrich data without Apollo?
n8n can call other enrichment APIs, but it doesn't provide contact or company data itself, so you still pay a separate data provider.
Otto runs marketing agents that learn what makes your customers buy.
See how it works